Question

Can we proove that 1+1 i snot equal to 2 or something that equivalent to 2, can we proove that, 1 is not a odd number? I guess we can, but how -_-... Cause i think like many ppl, rules of maths, even the basic maths changes depends on the realty or the space that its in... how to proove that? o.O

Answer 1

well acc to Saif and Ishaan 1+1=11.....idk O.o let me show u smth

Answer 2

http://openstudy.com/groups/mathematics#/groups/mathematics/updates/4e71fca70b8bbc8fb32ff997

Answer 3

so guys we can say 1 + 1 = 11, which it beings 2 when two 1's get near to each other :D :D so when you make it as 4... you will have the value 1111 or 22 all of them true, you can create another maths, which symbolises something... anyway, math is created to make the physics understandable by humans yea? we can make another thing another rules which is differen from normal maths... which symbolises physics. as true :D ;)

Answer 4

iny my idea, as i interpretted their maths :D :P

Answer 5

addition is only feasibly defined when the sets are distinct ...did i use that right?

Answer 6

in other words, they dont share elements

Answer 7

yeap

Answer 8

so tht's kinda joke?O.o

Answer 9

there is something to be had for notch arithmetic :)

Answer 10

/+/ = //

//*/// = //+//+// = //////

Answer 11

anyway, maths can be created with different rules, in case it symbolises the physics with true results... maths is abstract but physic is concrete, we understand the concrete by using the abstract!

Answer 12

yeap its ilke that, :) :D

Answer 13

////
--- = / ... ? might need to be better defined
///

Answer 14

hmmmm....

Answer 15

hmmm yes...

Answer 16

and angela its not a joke!! -_-

Answer 17

it gives the wrong result, if we thing that way...

Answer 18

math is a consistent set of rules and symbols; to put it bluntly; so as long as the rules and symbols dont create a contradiction within itself, its valid

Answer 19

you are right anyway... but the only valid thing is not normal maths i guess, there should be something more pratic to symbolize physics of 3D universe....

Answer 20

subtraction is not a comutative property unless we define subtraction in terms of addition :)

Answer 21

i would love to have the time to think of a math that relates to how a 4d object would view the world; and then dumb it down into 3d

Answer 22

hmmm

Answer 23

half the time i feel like im measureing the coastline of england with a yard stick

Answer 24

it should be really hard, and mybe undoable... cause of as like as the 2D shapes can't detect 3D shapes, they only see edges, 3D shapes can't detect 4D shapes, lets thing our universe a 3D one... there should be thosends of universes which likes ours, and they all are in 3D... and we can't detect other spaces, cause we are in 3D space, and we can't jump to another one or detect(in theory i guess) but the 4D space is where, we can detect all the 3D shapes, so we are creating the shapes and we are simple atoms which is being creating their 4D universe.. only part of a shape we can say... so they can detect all the 3D spaces, as we can detect all the 2D spaces... and 2D spaces can detect 1D, 5D spaces can detect 4D... Only i think like that.... wanna prove that!

Answer 25

o.O hmmm.. interesting i mean your feeling, you work really hard?

Answer 26

or trying to do something really hard