Can anyone help me rewrite the conclusion of argumentative paper?I am against animal testing, but my conclusion is weak.
In conclusion, I think humans should not use animals for scientific research. My reasons are all as follows. First, the results of animal research are not applicable to humans. In addition, using animals under the study and research in laboratories are cruel and unnecessary. Next, there are many alternatives to replace animal research.

Question

Can anyone help me rewrite the conclusion of  argumentative paper?I am against animal testing, but my conclusion is weak. 
In conclusion, I think humans should not use animals for scientific research. My reasons are all as follows. First, the results of animal research are not applicable to humans. In addition, using animals under the study and research in laboratories are cruel and unnecessary. Next, there are many alternatives to replace animal research.

anonymous · Answer

It might help to briefly mention the other side of the argument and then say something about how, despite giving consideration to the opposing side, you still think that animal testing is bad/harmful overall.

Not sure what other advice I can give... and I must admit that I don't particularly agree with the position you have chosen there.

anonymous · Answer

This is how I would word it. (I just moved your words around, and changed a few out. 
In conclusion, because the results of animal research are not applicable to humans, and using animals for study and research in laboratories are cruel and unnecessary,  I think humans should not use animals for scientific research. Instead, alternatives capable of replacing animal research should be used.

As a side note, not all animal research is not applicable. Some is very much so applicable. It all depends on the specific research being done.

anonymous · Answer

As an added note, if you use "are as follows" You would need a colon ( : ), you can't end a sentence with that.

anonymous · Answer

Im sorry i can't help to improve a argument i strongly object against...

anonymous · Answer

It's more a grammatical question than a bio question. It's not about being in support or against the argument, it's about helping structure it. Or, if you have no suggestions why post in it at all?
@GL123 , in regards to the message you sent me, I'm not sure what kind of content to suggest, but I do like the thought process you had, of offering your feelings on it, and/or where you think research is headed in terms of animal testing vs human analog testing.

anonymous · Answer

Im ok with animals dying to help humanity