Can someone help me with this 1 writing question?!! please! Based on what you know about the critical selection of Internet sites, explain whether you would use the following: 11. a site produced by a reputable university
It depends on what you were writing about. If your topic is related to something that university does well, then using their internet site would be a good use in a paper. If the topic is unrelated from something that the university does well and they just happen to mention your topic, I would not use it. Does that help? I think you are posting in the wrong section though.
Thanks.. Ya i am NOONE EVER REPLYS IN THE ENGLISH SECTION!! Could you help me with two more? i dont understad this at all!! :/
I can try to help. :-) What were the other ones?
Based on what you know about the critical selection of Internet sites, explain whether you would use the following: 1...a site with an obvious bias 2..an unbiased site, updated frequently. 3..a "vanity" site You are totally awseome for helping me btw!!! :D :P
1) I would not use a bias site for an academic paper because you would not get accurate information. You would get one side of the story. That could only be used if you showed two opposing bias sites in an augmentative paper.
2) An unbiased site could be used if the subject matter from their website is related to your paper topic. Does this unbiased site use credible sources? Or is it opinion based, while remaining unbiased? If it uses credible sources then using it would be ok.
3) A "vanity" site has no business in an academic paper.
It's no problem. :-) Glad I could help.
Your my new fan :)
:-) A little English is okay every once in a while. haha
Ok so i have a few more diffrent question but in the same category that i cant figure out, im googled out.. and i cant think of anythig i could right.
you dont have to anwser them if its too much to think because its late.. but just take a look? and maybe if its easy too you, give me your opinion?
I can take a look. I am about to log off soon. It's almost 3am here. :-)
Ok. Whoa, its only 12 a.m here lol Decide whether the following qualities are important to autobiography and biography. 1...They must be about famous people 2...They are always long.
these are brain twisters for me right now lol
haha it's hard to think the later it gets. I think I can still wrap my brain around these ones. 1) Being famous would have no impact on writing an autobiography. That is telling your own story. You can have any number of reasons for wanting to write your own story Biographies will more often be written about someone famous because you are not going to want to try to write about a random person off the street. If you are writing someone else's story, you want there to be something important about them to society. 2) This is not important for either one. Length is not a factor...it is the information it provides. If a biography or autobiography gets the same information across in 100 pages as one written in 400 pages, then there is no difference. Information in important, not length.
THANK YOU. you are a life saver for me tonight
You're welcome. Glad I could help. :-) I think that's it for me tonight though. Good luck with any others.
Me too. Im wiped out haha. Have a good night. :]
You too! :-)
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!