Important: This post is related to the Ambassador's form. When you fill it in, we will see if you are good enough to become an ambassador based on your past experience with users :) Good luck filling it in! http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/PBDB569 -The OpenStudy Ambassadors' Committee
Want to know what Ambassadors are about? Visit this detailed explanation by our very own founder! http://openstudy.com/study#/updates/4f13362ae4b0a4c24f5888c8
Voting for what?
For the ambassadors. Please see this - http://openstudy.com/updates/4fe0d497e4b06e92b86fffaf
We are dividing this into three parts - 1) Form filling 2) Getting nominated by us 3) Getting voted as an ambassador!
Oh....got ya
Okay this is what I have so far guys. Let me know what you think
@rebeccaskell94 Very well!
Thank you sir. I must go, yet again, haha. I will be back in a couple of hours though :)
hmm ok...mind telling this noob \((\leftarrow)\) what this is about? o.O
Read everything and you will know.
just my points of view...i dont think there should be a minimum smartscore..being SS 55 doesnt mean you've been on the site long..for example parth reached 57 in one day..so did my dupes..my point being SS shouldnt measure ambassadorship another point is the inactivity..true that ambies should be always available but forcing them to be online is like forcing the mods to be online during the dead hours and also..the ambassador program originally had "shift schedules"..that means all day there would be an online ambassador..that's what i think should be implemented instead also..each amby should be assigned a certain group (just like before) the new ambies go to the less populated groups..and the veteran ambies go to math, physics, etc.
btw..these suggestions were all in the original ambassador program so i didnt make it up..so it's legit
and lol..why does the survey contain *these* questions =))
Becoming Amby doesn't have anything to do with SS...
@lgbasallote You have a good point on the SS thing. I thought 6 weeks would be a *more* than fair enough time-frame. It doesn't really *force* them to be on at all. I love the idea of shift hours. At this point we are all new ambassadors so assigning groups is irrelevant.
Okay, guys. So I looked back through the two posts that are specifically related to the ambassador's program. I think that some basics we need to have 2 group leaders that kind of watch the rest of them. We could even cycle the group leaders out maybe once every month to give everyone a chance to show leadership in this area. We'd have to have an even number of Ambassadors and we'll just make Amby buddies kind of thing. Then, maybe like every other week or so all the Ambassadors meet up and discuss what's going on and future plans. We put together anything we may (as a group) want to talk about with the mods, and any new ideas we may have for the betterment of the group. Thoughts?
I think thats a good idea
This may be a great idea for all of us ..... so what is the date expected for this result -:P
btw...i think there should be a quota or something
like say 3-5 ambies per month who applied will be accepted
just so ambassadorship wont be too mainstream
And KC is back from her course:) now..parth explain me...do we leaders need to apply?
an old requirement for ambassadorship was 2 months experience in site..maybe that can be brought back too
and the SS 55 requirement should be replaced...with a 30 day days studied requirement..that is proof of their activity in site
there was also the resonsibility of an ambassador to tell new users about the openstudy features
I mentioned those things either right there^^^^^or in my file. I think ambassadors should be allowed to keep their job for about a year though as long as they are on and the leaders of the ambassador group cycle every month. You really should read through what I wrote though ;P
that should be added in the docx
no...your requirement was stating activity after someone becomes ambassador
what?
and you said "fairly long standing member" but no specifics..im stating the specifics
oh okay
• How to become an ambassador a. I think they need to be a fairly long standing member b. A minimum SmartScore of 55 c. At least 3 other members must recommend them, as well as another ambassador or mod d. They need to have good character, be mature, responsible, and be able to control their angers and jealousies. none is said about how long the person has been on site..im saying he should have 30 days studied
ah, fair enough. 30 seems reasonable.
i mods should enter this discussion and guide
and like i said before..one of the old responsibilities of ambies is telling old AND new users about new features of the site
oops i had studied only 24 days :(
the ambassadors are the first to know about the details to the os features
cant it be 20 days @lgbasallote or 22 days
No @mathlover @preetha told us to figure it out we have to make her proud xD and @cshalvey was the only one invited into this Amby group lol
like explaining smartscore thingies
and other complicated tech stuffs
@lgbasallote u r rightt..
like those templates that people always think as bugs
lol yeah like "I'm a masseuse"
@rebeccaskell94 u mean that u r given the resposibility to think about this ?
Yes @mathslover Preetha made me and Parth figure it all out haha
another one of the catch in amby before was..if an ambassador gets a legit warning/suspension/report abuse they get stripped of the badge..idk if it should be reimplemented
If it's legit and serious enough, definitely.
it also used to be a requirement that ambies should ahve clean records..but idk if that would be reimplemented too
lol would you make it then?
i have no legit warning or suspension.. also the timeframe of one year sounds long doesnt it
and i strongly support my idea for amby selection to have a quota
It already has a quota. Preetha picked us out already http://openstudy.com/study#/updates/4fe0a936e4b06e92b86fc995
not the committee
like for example every month a maximum of 5 ambassadors will just get accepted
oh, okay. Well, yes it will have a quote. Parth talked about having 10 options to vote from. So maybe like 8-10.
I think a month is too short a time frame. Even 6 weeks is better. why no shifts?
it's a bad idea
uhh okay. And deleting your comments is going to make it confusing for future readers @lgbasallote
it's a minor detail
the ambassador can have a term of 6 weeks..then after his 6 weeks ends..the os community will get to decide if he stays for 6 more weeks..since the duty of the ambassador is to the os community..it's only right the community gets to pickr eelctions
reelections*
the numbers can change
@Preetha has given a gr8 opportunity for us to make a decision ... this is called democracy where the people have therir voting rights... but i will prefer that to give this a new name instead of ambassadors .. so that this can reflect our leaders in a different beautiful way ...
Ambassadors name is not changing
Lol that clean record thing deff should be out some people change with responsibility and besides if they have to have a clean record before their even considerd Becca wouldnt even have a chance
another responsibility of an ambassador is kind of like a mediator between mods and users...because a lot of users are afraid of mods..intimidated
lol Chad is right. I was suspended once. and @lgba the mediators would be the 2 group leaders that I mentioned
hm. @lgbasallote is very correct. .. we can interact easily with ambassadors ... Ambassadors will refer some good students to the mods for some posts
no that's not the point of amby's and mods @mathslover
hmn ... @rebeccaskell94 do u mean ur and parthy with the point of 2 leaders ?
what i meant as mediator is that if an ordianry user has a problem..the amby is the one to tell the moderators if the user cant do it
2 group leaders cant be online all the time..
so who will the users talk to when they're off
there mut be atleast 4 leaders ..... and they should change after a fair time period..
Right now we are but I think cycling it out 4-6 weeks is a good idea. Okay good point..uhhmm let me think. I don't think we need too many people with too much power. Lol Chad I'll vote for you baby ;P
exactly
that's why im saying that 2 group leaders shouldnt just be the mediators
assigning too much power to 2 people isnt that good
Either is giving it to 4+
Well, for time shifts, i belive we can figure something out. Cuz i am always on 12 hours i can communicate for any of those daytime US shifts. just everyone needs to figure a time shift
where will be voting and when it will start @rebeccaskell94
I don't know @mathslover we have to give our final ideas to preetha in a week or less though
@lgb we have 5 leaders right now. we might get one more, but thats not in the question so much now. right now we need to be getting out mods back
i ahve said my points im out now..it's up to the "commitee" if they consider it
Thanks lgba
@karatechopper you misunderstand me...im not talking anything about leaders
oh sorry then:)
i was just saying that ambies should serve as mediators
to user and mod
what are mediators?
But only to a certain extent. We don't need them going "oh look, I'm important, let me talk to a mod because I cand and want to be noticed" @karatechopper and mediator is one who interacts for another. Example: A priest is a mediator between people in God in like Catholic circles
ahh...well then! we have all of our leaders are very interactive actually!
i think the leaders are confirmed approximately it is just my guess : rebecca , parthy , lgba and karatechopper ... may be me
lol I don't think you were on that list but okay then. Preetha said we could add one more and you forgot ash we have five for sure.
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!