Nathan studied the properties of a rhombus and a kite and concluded that a rhombus can be called a kite but a kite cannot be called a rhombus. Which statement supports his conclusion?

The equal sides in a rhombus must be adjacent unlike in a kite.

All sides in a rhombus must be equal unlike in a kite.

The diagonals in a rhombus must be congruent unlike in a kite.

The diagonals in a rhombus must be perpendicular unlike in a kite.

Question

Nathan studied the properties of a rhombus and a kite and concluded that a rhombus can be called a kite but a kite cannot be called a rhombus. Which statement supports his conclusion? 

The equal sides in a rhombus must be adjacent unlike in a kite.

 All sides in a rhombus must be equal unlike in a kite.

 The diagonals in a rhombus must be congruent unlike in a kite.

 The diagonals in a rhombus must be perpendicular unlike in a kite.

anonymous · Answer

All sides in a rhombus must be equal unlike in a kite, where the top sides are the same, yet different from the bottom two.

Simple enough. :)

hang254 · Answer

ok, thank you :)