In this lesson, you compared a recursive rule and an explicit rule used to define a sequence. For example, in the sequence 1, 3, 6, 10, 15, 21, … a recursive rule is an = an-1 + n. An explicit rule for the same sequence is (n2 + n)/2. Which rule do you think is easier to use when finding a term in the sequence? Why?
I would imagine that it would be easier and much computationally more efficient to use the second formula to find a single term
using the recursive method you have to calculate all of the values before the one you are trying to find in order to get the answer
though in terms of computing power required I think that the recursive formula would be more efficient at low values of n
for a randomly chosen value of n, though, you would want to calculate using formula 2
ie: try doing the first formula for 1000
n = 1000
or you can do the second formula for 1000 in a few seconds
actually, if you try and make a program for a TI-84 calculator that uses the first algorithm, it runs out of memory when trying to compute n = 1000
if you make a program using algorithm 2, you can calculate n = 1000 in a split second
so 2 is definitely better for a single, random n
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!