Nathan studied the properties of a rhombus and a kite and concluded that a rhombus can be called a kite but a kite cannot be called a rhombus. Which statement supports his conclusion?

The equal sides in a rhombus must be adjacent unlike in a kite.

All sides in a rhombus must be equal unlike in a kite.

The diagonals in a rhombus must be congruent unlike in a kite.

The diagonals in a rhombus must be perpendicular unlike in a kite.

Question

Nathan studied the properties of a rhombus and a kite and concluded that a rhombus can be called a kite but a kite cannot be called a rhombus. Which statement supports his conclusion? 

 The equal sides in a rhombus must be adjacent unlike in a kite. 

 All sides in a rhombus must be equal unlike in a kite. 

 The diagonals in a rhombus must be congruent unlike in a kite. 

 The diagonals in a rhombus must be perpendicular unlike in a kite.

unklerhaukus · Answer

The diagonals in a rhombus must be perpendicular $\textbf{ like}$ in a kite. 
|dw:1344087887670:dw|