Question

everyone has become socrates, what is up with that?

Answer 1

Google tells me that he was a philosopher.

Answer 2

Who is everyone?

Answer 3

Could you be more specific about the question?
(P.S. I can't attempt any of your questions.)

Answer 4

Everyone is orange here. No SS's.

Answer 5

huh
i duno what is that -n-

Answer 6

But I see all according to their colors.
Goodman green.
Satellite yellow.

Answer 7

Just kidding, lol.
Goodman yellow.
Satellite green.

Answer 8

wat about me

wat are socrates

=n=

Answer 9

\[\Huge \color{orange} {\text{Satellite73}}\]

Answer 10

lv up
parthkohli

Answer 11

lol

Answer 12

\[\color{orange}{\text{satellite73}} \]It's not an uppercase S. ahha

Answer 13

i cant watch youtube

Answer 14

+n+

Answer 15

Haha, wow @satellite73
That's how a teaching environment actually looks like, if you bring some seriousness into the matter.

Answer 16

SATELLITE ROXS !!!!

Answer 17

dont be MEAN ParthKohli

^x^

Answer 18

On the funnier side, I find it amusing :P

Answer 19

he is awsome

Answer 20

hes the best

Answer 21

he one point higher than you

Answer 22

^n^

Answer 23

Everyone judges on the basis of SmartScore, what's up with that?

@satellite73's new topic.

Answer 24

thats not nice

Answer 25

well i guess

Answer 26

you have a point there

Answer 27

@TAMATCHI123 Now is the time to look at these members and comparing their knowledge to satellite's:
@Limitless
@nbouscal
@across
@eliassaab
@badreferences

Answer 28

im canadian

Answer 29

oh ya?????

Answer 30

fyi

Answer 31

yay canada

Answer 32

even tho they mostly have bronze medals

Answer 33

@parthkohli let me ask you...what exactly is your basis on "smartness" by the fancy words they say? is that really the basis of smartness? those who can express themselves simply are those who know what they're saying after all. using fancy words only shows vocabulary..not smartness. are you basing it because they have math discussions in chat ad satellite does not chat? i think your reasons are subjective if you have no proper criteria.

Answer 34

for the record...i have been taught by all of the users you mentioned and let me tell you...i did not understand any of their explanations. they used very complex things. so as far as im concerned fancy words are not the avenue of intelligence; being able to express concepts simply and being able to teach it to someone is the avenue of smartness. what is the essence of intelligence if only you can understand it after all

Answer 35

...What's going on in this thread?

Answer 36

Not sure.

Answer 37

I see the term "intelligence" being thrown around. Because I'm a firm believer in the powers of SCIENCE (TM) I think it's important to remind everyone exactly what we do know, biometrically, about intelligence:

http://socrates.berkeley.edu/~maccoun/PP279_Neisser1.pdf

It's a very good paper; and also, "Socrates" is in the URL as well! I urge you all to read it. It's awesome.

Answer 38

nice pic badrefrences

Answer 39

"for the record...i have been taught by all of the users you mentioned and let me tell you...i did not understand any of their explanations."

This is a lie.

That is all.