Question

I need help interpreting this case. I do not understand who is the accused and who is the appellant and who is the respondent.

Answer 1

If you blame somebody for something wrong, that person is the 'accused'. If you go to a court and file a case against somebody for doing some crime against you,you are the accuser and he is the accused.
The person who appeals is the appellant.For example,if you are not satisfied with a court decision or verdict, you can appeal for a revision.In that case you are the appellant.
I have answered your question, so I am the respondent.

Answer 2

But how do you interpret that on a case? for example this one is the one i am having trouble with https://scc.lexum.org/en/2008/2008scc19/2008scc19.html