conjunctions,
disjunctions,
negation,
check my work?
Simplify the following symbolic statements as much as you can, leaving your answer in a standard symbolic form
Still Need Help?
Join the QuestionCove community and study together with friends!
Sign Up
OpenStudy (unklerhaukus):
hartnn (hartnn):
unkle same thing..
OpenStudy (unklerhaukus):
almost the same
hartnn (hartnn):
(e) doesn't simplify to x^2 >9 ?
OpenStudy (unklerhaukus):
is that simpler?
Still Need Help?
Join the QuestionCove community and study together with friends!
Sign Up
OpenStudy (unklerhaukus):
is that simplified standard symbolic form ?
OpenStudy (unklerhaukus):
im not sure , i thought it would be good to get x by it self ,
hartnn (hartnn):
i think, but u can keep it that way also....it isn't incorrect.
hartnn (hartnn):
rest all r correct.
OpenStudy (unklerhaukus):
\[(x>3)\vee (x<-3)\longleftrightarrow (x^2>9)\],
i can't decide which is simpler
Still Need Help?
Join the QuestionCove community and study together with friends!
Sign Up
hartnn (hartnn):
(3<x<-3)
OpenStudy (unklerhaukus):
x is outside that region not inside
hartnn (hartnn):
if it was inside i would have written
(-3<x<3)
OpenStudy (unklerhaukus):
oh, right
but this dosent make sense either
3 < x< -3
3 < -3 ?
OpenStudy (unklerhaukus):
x<3, -3<x
Still Need Help?
Join the QuestionCove community and study together with friends!
Sign Up
hartnn (hartnn):
(3<x<-3)
-3>x>3
both of these will not work....hmmm.....
then keep it as you have written........
OpenStudy (unklerhaukus):
\[-3\not<x\not<3\] ?
hartnn (hartnn):
O.o
possible...
OpenStudy (unklerhaukus):
im guessing here ,
OpenStudy (unklerhaukus):
it looks ugly
Still Need Help?
Join the QuestionCove community and study together with friends!
Sign Up
hartnn (hartnn):
why take chances ?
keep it as u mentioned earlier....in pdf.