Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 18 Online
OpenStudy (unklerhaukus):

conjunctions, disjunctions, negation, check my work? Simplify the following symbolic statements as much as you can, leaving your answer in a standard symbolic form

OpenStudy (unklerhaukus):

hartnn (hartnn):

unkle same thing..

OpenStudy (unklerhaukus):

almost the same

hartnn (hartnn):

(e) doesn't simplify to x^2 >9 ?

OpenStudy (unklerhaukus):

is that simpler?

OpenStudy (unklerhaukus):

is that simplified standard symbolic form ?

OpenStudy (unklerhaukus):

im not sure , i thought it would be good to get x by it self ,

hartnn (hartnn):

i think, but u can keep it that way also....it isn't incorrect.

hartnn (hartnn):

rest all r correct.

OpenStudy (unklerhaukus):

\[(x>3)\vee (x<-3)\longleftrightarrow (x^2>9)\], i can't decide which is simpler

hartnn (hartnn):

(3<x<-3)

OpenStudy (unklerhaukus):

x is outside that region not inside

hartnn (hartnn):

if it was inside i would have written (-3<x<3)

OpenStudy (unklerhaukus):

oh, right but this dosent make sense either 3 < x< -3 3 < -3 ?

OpenStudy (unklerhaukus):

x<3, -3<x

hartnn (hartnn):

(3<x<-3) -3>x>3 both of these will not work....hmmm..... then keep it as you have written........

OpenStudy (unklerhaukus):

\[-3\not<x\not<3\] ?

hartnn (hartnn):

O.o possible...

OpenStudy (unklerhaukus):

im guessing here ,

OpenStudy (unklerhaukus):

it looks ugly

hartnn (hartnn):

why take chances ? keep it as u mentioned earlier....in pdf.

OpenStudy (unklerhaukus):

hmmm

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!