Question

Nathan studied the properties of a rhombus and a kite and concluded that a rhombus can be called a kite but a kite cannot be called a rhombus. Which statement supports his conclusion? The diagonals in a rhombus must be perpendicular unlike in a kite.
The equal sides in a rhombus must be adjacent unlike in a kite.
The diagonals in a rhombus must be congruent unlike in a kite.
All sides in a rhombus must be equal unlike in a kite.