Question

I wish so hard for a time machine. Even if it was for once. I wish for it.

Answer 1

bhaad me gaya CoC ! kyun? ;)

Answer 2

Please some one help me build the time machine with your mathematical powers :P

Answer 3

If I had a time machine, I would go to the future in a time where a moderator is online and make him delete this post. ;)

Answer 4

Haha :D

Answer 5

Good one

Answer 6

And go to the physics section; a time machine is physical -- not mathematical...

Answer 7

Mission Disturb Another Group: successful :D

Answer 8

Well I guess it is some how mathematical too.

Answer 9

probability is zero

Answer 10

Hmm.

Is there any research work being done ?

Answer 11

yaa there many research regarding the time ravel rather then time machine. first they want to confirm whether time ravel is possible or not.

Answer 12

really?

Answer 13

Um,Is time a vector quantity then ?

Answer 14

yaa .. In order to time travel we need to move in the speed of light or greater than that . which is called as cosmic speed limit. recently only they proved that higgs bosons can travel at a velocity greater than light speed . so scientist are trying some means to travel at light speed.

Answer 15

well i should warn all dont underestimate or forget RAJNIKANTH here.. :|

Answer 16

Yes, Hawkins showed that... but we can only travel to the future

Answer 17

\[E \neq mc^2\]

Answer 18

yaa @ParthKohli your right .. we can only go to future.. not the past

Answer 19

If we go into the future we will not be able to return back ?

Answer 20

Naw.

Answer 21

higgs bosons can Not travel at a velocity greater than light speed.
what ever gave you that idea @chandhuru ?

Answer 22

Time travelling has different meaning

1. in this case they say there is a parallel universe existing and we can use worm holes as a gate way to reach the other universe.

2. consider the case ur sitting in a train which can move at the speed of light . your train starts moving in the year 2000. as ur moving at the speed of light the time frame moves slowly. ur travelling in that train for 50 years . when the train stops and u come down . u will see the people 50 years older but ur age will less than them. this is because ur time frame moved slowly relatively.

Answer 23

Actually \(c\) is the max possible speed. A proton reached \(\approx 0.99c\) once.

Answer 24

@chandhuru I watched the exact thing on Discovery Channel! :O

Answer 25

It also said that time moves slowly around the pyramids.

Answer 26

@UnkleRhaukus they proved recently in large haldron collider (LHC).
i read an article and they proved it. U can google it if u want.

Answer 27

no object with mass can reach c

Answer 28

they are trying ... see when an object is kept near a black hole it is sucked into it at the velocity of light and the object is converted into energy.

Answer 29

We cannot see an object getting sucked into a black hole.

Answer 30

CERN did a press release about neutrinos exceeding the speed of light a while ago , but this turned out to be a huge embarrassing mistake

no object of mass can exceed c

Answer 31

it would require infinite energy

Answer 32

@UnkleRhaukus that experiment was carried out twice .. and both the time they got almost same result. neutrinos were travelling at 1/60 seconds faster than light.

they did these experiments using atomic clocks to validate it.
CERN said that they will do it again so that they can affirmatively say that neutrinos travel faster than light.

Answer 33

http://press.web.cern.ch/press-releases/2011/09/opera-experiment-reports-anomaly-flight-time-neutrinos-cern-gran-sasso

Answer 34

also higgs boson is not the same as a neutrino

Answer 35

Its worth noting here that you could travel backwards in time, its just a more complex theory, in order to go to the future you have to travel faster than the speed of light...

Answer 36

WHICH is IMPOSSIBLE

Answer 37

ehh to an extent, if you moved through a wormhole and appeared on the other side of the universe you technically traveled faster than the speed of light if you take speed=Distance/time

Answer 38

there is no evidence for wormholes

Answer 39

sure there is, its a mathematical solution....

Answer 40

mathematical theory IS NOT physical evidence

Answer 41

alright fair enough however there is no evidence that suggest the impossibility of it correct?

Answer 42

also if an object gets close to a black hole the gravity pulls it faster than the speed of light then crushes it...

Answer 43

i give up. im too angry now

Answer 44

at me?