I need help with this question. Explain how the example paragraph above illustrates endorsement and why that fallacy makes the argument weak. I play professional basketball, and I gotta have the right equipment to get the job done. Of all the things I need to be at my best, it's my shoes that make or break it for me. After all, I've got to travel up and down that court a hundred times a game. For our city to be at the top of its game, it needs good shoes too, a commuter system that's top notch so our quality workers can get in and out of the city quickly and safely. Less hassle
plus this Less hassle means more productivity. That's why I encourage you to join me in voting "Yes" on light rail.
okay... I don't really understand what it's asking...
wait nvm hang on
did you read the whole paragraph
the author repeats themself alot... he doesnt explain much... he's very vague in his descriptions
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!