Question

sociologists predict that, compared to males, females:
a)are more likely to be polygamous
b)are more likely to be promiscuous
c)are more likely to be monogamous
d) are more likely to choose a young, attractive mate

Answer 1

Definitely, "B".

Answer 2

@abb0t

I actually think that men and women can be equally promiscuous.

I'm leaning on C.

We know about the differences between the sexual-biological roles of men and women.
The idea that men's sexual roles revolve around passing on genetic material to offspring,
and women's roles are centered on nurturing those offspring.

I've been searching for evidence that might back up any one of those options.

~~~~~~~~~~~~

@kaelyb

Your question mentions "sociologists."

Did you mean to say "sociobiologists"?

Answer 3

okay thank you! @InYourHead and yes i meant sociobiologists sorry lol

Answer 4

Nope. I'm sticking to "B".
PROOF: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0J3vgcE5i2o

Answer 5

@kaelyb

Okay. I just wanted to ask, because I've come across this question before.

~~~~~~~~

But I can't argue with Nelly Furtado.

abb0t's source material is indisputable. He gets a medal.

Answer 6

abb0t is definitely clueless. women tend to want to be monogamous.

Answer 7

Oh look, a feminist.

Answer 8

no feminist here. abb0t no I dont settle i am looking for a man with intelligence and very few men have the smarts to keep up with me. Have a good time with being promiscuous and the like

Answer 9

@abb0t

Have you been hitting on her? Or otherwise sending messages of sexual receptivity?

Answer 10

ROFLMAO!!!!!!!!!!

Answer 11

no he hasnt but I took it as meaning that I settle for just anything and I dont. I want inteligent conversation

Answer 12

that would be the wrong use of the word

Answer 13

@msumner

Calm yo tits.

I understand the concept of "feminism," I swear to you.

And I might even agree with you.

Answer 14

all i wanted was conversation I am sorry for wasting your time.

Answer 15

@sherryJo
http://www.christianmingle.com/

Answer 16

lol!

Answer 17

@InYourHead we are obviously just messing around
you didn't have to include female body parts to make your case

Answer 18

delete your post or I will say calm your highlights

Answer 19

"Calm my highlights"? Oh no, you wouldn't!

Sadly they've come and gone. It's an old picture.

Answer 20

I am simply asking a very easy task to be accomplished before this thread gets out of proportion

Answer 21

Duly noted!

Whatever you decide to do, you'd best do it now.

We wouldn't want to wait TOO long, for this thread to get "out of proportion."

Answer 22

the question is nonsense in my opinion I doubt they "predict" anything. At best they can observe what is in the population now. We might consider that this observation is the result of biology as well as society influences. But in any case we should keep in mind that this is an inductive reasoning. IMHO these "sociologists" should consider going out of the 50's and be doing experiments.

Answer 23

BTW there are societies working differently.

Answer 24

Havent gone away. I just decided this conversation was beneath me and was quickly circling the drain. Besides someone who hides behide his hair or doesnt have a picture on his profile doesnt have room to talk about my anatomy

Answer 25

Typical mortal mentality