Ask
your own question, for FREE!
History
8 Online
Anti-federalists believed that a bill of rights was: A. unnecessary because the Declaration of Independence listed many individual rights B. unnecessary due to the structure of government and rights under the Constitution C. necessary because the Constitution did not specify protection for individual rights D. necessary because laws would not follow rights in the Declaration of Independence
Still Need Help?
Join the QuestionCove community and study together with friends!
I am going with C.
C, because they were ANTI federalists, they wanted the people's rights to be "set in stone" so that the government could not take those unalienable rights away from them. Just remember, ANTI federalist is ANTI big government, so it's PRO people's rights.
Can't find your answer?
Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Latest Questions
Maci:
what are the best stock apps for people who want to start investing?
Twaylor:
genuienly how do i get better self control i keep watcing youtube and theres this
IzzyCookie:
|dw:1792074056138:dw| Uhm, I don't know where to ask this, but I'm in college welding at my community college, and I need help learning vertical welding for
thehearken:
not sure if this is considered spam, im sorry if it is, but does anyone have tips
3 days ago
3 Replies
2 Medals
6 days ago
3 Replies
0 Medals
1 day ago
9 Replies
1 Medal
1 week ago
2 Replies
1 Medal