Help Please. What resulted from the Supreme Court's ruling in Miranda v. Arizona (1966)? A. Evidence obtained in an unconstitutional manner could not be used in court. B. Prosecutors could no longer engage in plea bargaining with defense attorneys. C. People who were being arrested had to be informed of their Constitutional rights. D. Criminal defendants who could not afford an attorney had to be provided with one for free.
A. Evidence obtained in an unconstitutional manner could not be used in court.
(MC)Which statement describes how Native Americans reacted to the United States' entry into World War II?
They opposed the war and many refused to register for the draft They largely ignored the war and mostly remained on reservations. They supported the war effort and joined the military in large numbers. They supported the war effort by working in war industries and joined the military in large numbers. They supported the war effort by giving up their lands to build factories.
That's what i thought, yess. haha, Thank you For all your help today(:
Sorry, but that is way wrong, number 1. Miranda vs. Arizona says that someone being arrested must be told their rights. You know, "You have the right to remain silent.." Etc. :P
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!