What was the Supreme Court concerned about in its ruling in Miranda v. Arizona (1966)? preventing elected officials from abusing their power preventing government intrusions in people's private lives ensuring speedy compliance with its desegregation rulings protecting people's right not to testify against themselves unwillingly
i know for sure its not B) preventing government intrusions in peoples private lives
what kinda History you got?
It's a government class i believe :) just gimme a sec
U.S.
Summary of Miranda v. Arizona--- Miranda v. Arizona, (1966) dealt with the need for individuals in police custody to understand their constitutional rights before being questioned by police. The specific protections addressed are the Fifth Amendment right not to incriminate oneself, and the Sixth Amendment right to legal counsel. The "fundamentals of fairness" standard, derived from the Fourteenth Amendment Equal Protection Clause, demands that the accused be aware of his (or her) options in dealing with police so he can make informed decisions and not unwittingly act against his best interest.
anyboyd go world history B
So @Zale101 it would be A, right?
its not A
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!