Kelly and Daniel wrote the following proofs to prove that vertical angles are congruent. Who is correct? Line segment NT intersects line segment MR forming four angles; angles 1 and 3 are vertical angles; and angles 2 and 4 are vertical angles. Kelly’s Proof Statement Justification Angle2 = Angle4 Vertical angles are congruent Angle1 = Angle3 Vertical angles are congruent Vertical Angles are congruent. Vertical Angle Theorem Daniel’s Proof Statement Justification Angle1 + Angle2 = 180° Definition of Supplementary Angles Angle1 + Angle4 = 180° Definition of Supplementary Angles Angle1 + Angle2 = Angle1 + Angle4 Transitive Property of Equality Angle2 = Angle4 Subtraction Property of Equality Answers: Both Kelly and Daniel are correct. Neither Kelly or Daniel is correct. Kelly is correct, but Daniel is not. Daniel is correct, but Kelly is not.
wow no one helped you out. That's sad
Yeah, everyone is so mean. Dx
lol ill help let me read
Daniel is correct, but Kelly is not. and it is Definitely Daniel's proof because you want to prove that the vertical angles are congruent we cant use vertical angles are congruent to prove that they are congruent.
so does that help?
Yes, thank you. (:
yw
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!