Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 13 Online
OpenStudy (anonymous):

Can anybody PLEASE help me with this proof?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

OpenStudy (anonymous):

For the first statement, I wrote the given information. For the second statement, would CA is congruent to CA and the reason -> the reflexive property of congruence?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Yes, x=x is the reflexive property

OpenStudy (anonymous):

But it is a bit redundant.

OpenStudy (campbell_st):

what about DA = BA... thats given to you so congruency is proven by SSS postulate

OpenStudy (anonymous):

so DC=BC and DA=BA are the given. and then CA=CA by the reflexive property. should there be more statements?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I have to prove that AC bisects <DAB

OpenStudy (campbell_st):

nope... triangles only have 3 sides, so you have proved congruency but if I was doing the proof I data with|dw:1375866401459:dw|

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!