Which best describes consensus historiography?

A. a bottom-up look at historical events to rethink the traditional perspective
B. a re-interpretation of facts based on new evidence and resulting in new conclusions
C. a revisionist interpretation of events in which all viewpoints are considered
D. a top-down look at historical events to rethink the traditional perspective
E. a view of history in which the traditional interpretation is upheld

@Kfins99

Question

Which best describes consensus historiography?

A. a bottom-up look at historical events to rethink the traditional perspective 
B. a re-interpretation of facts based on new evidence and resulting in new conclusions
C. a revisionist interpretation of events in which all viewpoints are considered
D. a top-down look at historical events to rethink the traditional perspective
E. a view of history in which the traditional interpretation is upheld

@Kfins99

anonymous · Answer

I'm sorry, I don't know anything about consensus historiography, and I can't find any research about it

anonymous · Answer

I found this... If this helps ._. The consensus view of History emerged in the United States in 1950 until it's eventual dismiss in 1965. Consensus historians emerged in a time period when there were not many consensuses in the United States. !

anonymous · Answer

Same, but that doesn't describe it :/

anonymous · Answer

Darn :/.

anonymous · Answer

Ikr!

anonymous · Answer

What would be my best guess? Like.. If you had to guess lol.

anonymous · Answer

B) A re-interpretation of facts based on new evidence and resulting in new conclusions

anonymous · Answer

Ight' thanks aha.

anonymous · Answer

I'll message you all the correct and incorrect answers after it's all done.

anonymous · Answer

what was the answer