Question

DOES THE LAST SENTENCE MAKE SENSE? IF NOT HOW CAN I BE ABLE TO CHANGE IT SO IT CAN MAKE SENSE?

Answer 1

Education is something that has been a very positive aspect in the world since the world was created. Not only is education important for everyone to achieve, those who could not afford it before, now can get it for free. College is very expensive, and not many could afford it before, so either they don’t go, or they stick with their minimum waged job. Now the government will pay for a kids college funds, and will allow them to get the proper education they deserve. Since education has become free throughout the world, low income families will not be left out, since they will be covered by the government. Low income families or otherwise will not feel burdened by the high cost of education for their children. Also people with higher education generally lead to higher paying, and better jobs. There is also a self-confidence factor that can come from having a higher education than others. On the contrary, free education can lead to substandard education or educational goals if there is not enough money to the educator.

Answer 2

this sentence looks fine to me

Answer 3

Yeah me too

Answer 4

I Would Rephrase It -
On the contrary, free education can lead to substandard education or educational goals. That is IF there is not enough money to the educator <--- How I would put it.
On the contrary, free education can lead to substandard education or educational goals if there is not enough money to the educator <--- Sounds a bit like a run on sentence >.>

Answer 5

Either way is good to me...

Answer 6

its fine .... :)