@jigglypuff314 I need a bit more help. But I understand it more now ;33333333
okay, shoot :)
if they can prove that angle RTQ = angle RTS or that QR = RS then Jordan would be correct. if not, then Robert would be correct
Sooo.... Who is correct?
just by the amount of information given by the diagram, Robert would be correct because there is not enough information to prove anything more than what was already given.
total interior angle measurement a triangle can have = 180 but 37 + 97 + 134 does not equal 180
It says 2 ways. D:
a triangle cannot have more than one angle bigger than 90 degrees...
the definition of an obtuse triangle is : a triangle that contains an obtuse interior angle therefore by definition, Joey is correct.
They both bisect stuff. but perpendicular bisectors bisect a line segment while angle bisectors bisect angles
They are all vertex to point on opposite side. differences are that A perpendicular bisector is a segment that is perpendicular to a segment at it’s midpoint. A median of a triangle is a segment whose endpoints are a vertex of the triangle and the midpoint of the opposite side The altitudes of a triangle is the perpendicular segment from a vertex to the opposite side or to the line that contains the opposite side.
That it?
I think so
oh got it ;3
solve for x when given 6x + 4x + 6+ 8x + 3 = 63
18x + 9 = 63
18x = 54
x=3 ?
yep :) then plug back into what each sides are.... so 6x then 4x + 6 then 8x + 3 and compare what you get...
so you get that sides are 18, 18, 27 then because two sides are the same length, then by definition of isosceles triangle
to find x, you would need a congruency postulate that does not include angle x to be proven true. therefore there is not enough information to find x.
Thank you! That's all!
you're welcome :) glad I could help! Have a nice day! :D
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!