Ask your own question, for FREE!
English 7 Online
OpenStudy (anonymous):

Please help

OpenStudy (anonymous):

and say what u think subscribe iff u like

OpenStudy (anonymous):

http://thetruemeaningofguns.blogspot.com/

OpenStudy (anonymous):

The problem really isn't people with guns its idiots with guns like people that shouldn't have guns such as Adam Lanza we shouldn't be allowing mentally troubled people to have guns and we should in force better safety laws but not strip everybody of the guns.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

that's one major problem yeah but like Zimmerman he isn't mentally ill yet he shot an innocent

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Zimmerman needed a further background check he shouldn't have been neighborhood watch in the first place

OpenStudy (anonymous):

he still wasn't mentally ill

OpenStudy (anonymous):

yeah but further background checks should also be enforced

OpenStudy (anonymous):

again another problem but what about people who just go Looney because something happened like someone they know died and they decide to shoot someone

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Well you got me there but even then that almost never occurs

OpenStudy (anonymous):

what about wars they occur, a parent's son dies, ever watch white house

OpenStudy (anonymous):

they go looney

OpenStudy (anonymous):

or if your brother in law abused ur sister u'd go looney and shoot him

OpenStudy (anonymous):

or if you were picked on your whole life and no one understood you including your social worker (kinda like me) u may commit suicide

OpenStudy (anonymous):

but how do you get your hands on a gun?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

if say we had a Psychiatrist have a short session with the person before they could purchase a gun?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

what if they bought it from the black market or so?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

that's not our problem we would still have a black market no matter what

OpenStudy (anonymous):

....... well I guess we're even you stumped me on one I stumped u on one, but the thing is guns aren't needed

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Gun's are needed in many occasions really the thing is is guns save just as many if not more lives then they destroy it's really a stale mate with the whole issue I see your side but I also see the other side.... it just is an endless debate that can't and most likely never will be won

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I guess but guns kill more and anyways they don't save lives if someone is the innocent one that shoots a life is still gone

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Not if the innocent knows how to aim which most people do there are many places to shoot a person to simply disable them while the innocent contacts the authorities for example: kneecaps, right shoulder and just under the gut.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

what if it's a gun to gun then they would have to quickly fire any area so they could liive

OpenStudy (anonymous):

true but during that split second they have the ability to make a rough guess and fire at the shoulder possibly or the knee or leg still disabling the perp

OpenStudy (anonymous):

not every1 is that accurate. They're not living in the movies, they're not Sherlock holmes or james bond always aiming accurately

OpenStudy (anonymous):

nobody is but its a 50/50 chance that they will hit the designated area if not somewhere near the designated area

OpenStudy (anonymous):

oh and here's my question to you: have you ever touched or fired a gun?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

then you have no idea about accuracy therefore your point is invalid

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!