Question

What resulted from the Supreme Court's ruling in Miranda v. Arizona (1966)?

a. Evidence obtained in an unconstitutional manner could not be used in court.
b. Prosecutors could no longer engage in plea bargaining with defense attorneys.
c. People who were being arrested had to be informed of their Constitutional rights.
d. Criminal defendants who could not afford an attorney had to be provided with one for free.

Answer 1

In Miranda v. Arizona, the Supreme Court ruled that detained criminal suspects, prior to police questioning, must be informed of their constitutional right to an attorney and against self-incrimination.

Answer 2

which one is it?

Answer 3

From the information I just told you, which one do you think it is?

Answer 4

c?

Answer 5

@Firejay5 ?

Answer 6

oh my god never mind.