Ask your own question, for FREE!
History 8 Online
OpenStudy (helpblahblahblah):

ILL GIVE MEDALS:

OpenStudy (helpblahblahblah):

Which question below did the Miranda v. Arizona outcome answer? Should more evidence be required to arrest someone of a crime than just the victim's identification of the accused criminal? Should a defendant be allowed to sign a written confession to a crime if an attorney is not present when the accused is being questioned by the police? Should legal counsel always be appointed by the court, or should the citizen accused of a crime have the right to choose the attorney he would like to represent him? Should a confession be allowed in a court of law if it was obtained without warnings against self-incrimination and without legal counsel?

OpenStudy (helpblahblahblah):

@PurpleUnicornn7771234

OpenStudy (helpblahblahblah):

@Mister_Kid_Dynamite

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I take it you don't know about the Miranda v. Arizona case?

OpenStudy (helpblahblahblah):

no becuz its a prete4st but i dont wanna get such a bad grade

OpenStudy (anonymous):

oooohh ahah okay only because it is a pretest and I understand I will tell you the answer is the last one!:)

OpenStudy (helpblahblahblah):

okay thanks

OpenStudy (helpblahblahblah):

@PurpleUnicornn7771234

OpenStudy (anonymous):

yess?

OpenStudy (helpblahblahblah):

are u going to help?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

what do you mean I have been. I told you the answer was the last one

OpenStudy (anonymous):

lol, you must have not read all of my previous comment.

OpenStudy (helpblahblahblah):

okay

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!