The correlation coefficient for practicing violin and getting better grades in a group of people is 0.8. Analyze the following statement. Playing violin causes students to get better grades. Is this a reasonable conclusion? Yes; students who play violin must necessarily get better grades Yes; the correlation coefficient is above 0.5, so that implies causation No; playing violin and earning better grades are completely unrelated No; even though there is a strong positive correlation, playing violin doesn't cause students to get better grades
please help need really quick
@Compassionate
@amistre64
please
No, it is not a reasonable conclusion. Playing the violin doesn't cause you to get better grades, nor does getting better grades cause you to take up the violin (or play it better). However, skills that help you play the violin (attention to detail, willingness to work, etc.) are also skills which may help you get better grades. So, correlation, but not causality.
its c
^hes wrong
Yeah, sure I am.
thank you for agreeing
0.8 positive correlation coefficient is a strong one.
But do enlighten us — what is incorrect about my answer?
What specifically makes C a superior answer? I think we agree that A and B are out.
ok if you actually look at this in a different way causation is " one thing happenes because of another" so if you look at its asking causation not correlation so when you read the problem playing the violin does not have to do with anything about getting grades. Its not asking if it correleates its asking you if one thing couses the other
its asking a causation and they both have nothing to do with each other
Which part of answer D is incorrect, hmm?
you dont know if theres any other information besides .8
you cant rely on .8 to be a correlation you need a line instead of one point
i think it coud be d because it is a strong posative corralation but does not mean it causes a better grde
What do you think "The correlation coefficient [...] is 0.8" means? It's not referring to a point, it is referring to a relationship between two variables.
D was correct
my mistake im sorry
can i still have credit for argueing
or debating\
From practical experience as a violinist and student for many years, I can attest that what I said is true, at least in my experience: the skills necessary to become a good violinist tend to give you the tools to be a good student. It isn't causation, because you won't necessarily apply them, and some people are naturally gifted and don't have to "study", but there is a large positive correlation.
There's no button for "give credit for debating" but I'll give you a medal for admitting your mistake, which is a classy move in my book.
The correct answer is D. ''No; even though there is a strong positive correlation, playing violin doesn't cause students to get better grades'' TOOK the test & got it Right.
Pretty sure OP just said that
lol
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!