Why did constitutional monarchy develop in England while absolute monarchy continued in Russia?

Russia was less economically developed than England and relied on a strong monarch to address the nation’s issues.

Russian monarchs like Peter the Great increased the power of the nobility, while English monarchs like Elizabeth I refused to consult with the English Parliament.

Russian monarchs deeply resented the intrusion of religious authorities into affairs of state, while English monarchs believed they owed allegiance to the head of the Church.

Russia thrived economically under absol

Question

Why did constitutional monarchy develop in England while absolute monarchy continued in Russia?

Russia was less economically developed than England and relied on a strong monarch to address the nation’s issues.

Russian monarchs like Peter the Great increased the power of the nobility, while English monarchs like Elizabeth I refused to consult with the English Parliament.

Russian monarchs deeply resented the intrusion of religious authorities into affairs of state, while English monarchs believed they owed allegiance to the head of the Church.

Russia thrived economically under absol

kewlgeek555 · Answer

@Xmoses1 @Destinymasha @Nurali

destinymasha · Answer

umm....... D is incomplete

destinymasha · Answer

that actually has to be the answer......the rest -nope :}

nurali · Answer

i think  Russia thrived economically under absolute monarchs, while England relied on Parliament to rebuild after the English Civil War.

destinymasha · Answer

yea ^^^^  it's D :}

xmoses1 · Answer

I just looked it up and D is for sure the right answer :D

kewlgeek555 · Answer

Well thank you guys!  I gave @Nurali a medal because he was the only one who didn't recieve one. ^-^

destinymasha · Answer

oh, yes sorry about that --you're welcome :}

xmoses1 · Answer

Haha that is fair :)