Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 7 Online
OpenStudy (anonymous):

Choose the abbreviation of the postulate or theorem that supports the conclusion that WAS NOT . Given: W = N, S = T, WS = NT. SSS SAS ASA AAS

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I hated these...I never did figure out how to do it. Sorry :/

OpenStudy (tennistar):

Is there a picture? I'm not too good with these kind of things so yea

OpenStudy (anonymous):

sss

OpenStudy (anonymous):

side-side-side

OpenStudy (tennistar):

@SuyashGupta You don't just give answers, check the code of conduct. Please explain how you arrived at this conclusion.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

well dont worry... clearly corresponding sides of both answers are equal so this is sss congruency

OpenStudy (anonymous):

wait sorry... @marinesgirlfriend373 u must give info that here in w and s u mean angles..so, two corres angles and side between them are equal .. thus it is angle-side-angle(asa) cong. cond..

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!