Why is a biography not a primary source of information? A. It is looking back on the events of the person's life. B. A primary source cannot be about just one person. C. A biography is too long to be a primary source. D. A biography is not accurate enough to be a primary source.
Biographies are not created at the time of events. Good biographies use lots of primary sources. But since they report information perhaps decades old, not usually considered primary themselves.
So "D. A biography is not accurate enough to be a primary source."?
I would think so because a biographyy would be considered a secondary source and for it to be a primary source it would of been autobiography..... so ya I think D
Ok thanks. :)
@Awesome781 please do not give away the answers lead them to it....Read the CODE OF CONDUCT
@gamer56 he had the answer I clarified it
any ways your wrong because i just answered it on my own paper and it was A. looking back on a persons life
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!