Ask your own question, for FREE!
English 7 Online
OpenStudy (anonymous):

HEY CAN SOME ONE HELP ME I WILL GIVE MEDALS

OpenStudy (anonymous):

An author claims that "Athletes caught using performance-enhancing drugs should be sentenced to prison." The author provides the following reason as support: In 2013, the TV show Sport-Zone surveyed 2,000 athletes. 73 percent admitted knowing a teammate who took performance-enhancing drugs. Huang Kroll, spokesperson for the International Olympic Committee, was interviewed during the program. "Using illegal substances to gain an advantage is a huge issue," he explained. "Unless stronger laws are passed—laws that result in prison rather than suspension from competition—the problem will continue to grow." Which choice best describes the reason the author provides? It is effective. It supports the claim clearly and logically. It is irrelevant. It discusses a fact that is off topic and does not support the claim. It is unreliable. It does not give any details to prove that the source can be trusted. It is unverified. It does not cite a source to show where the information was located.

OpenStudy (therealmeeeee):

The Last choice!

OpenStudy (anonymous):

thanks

OpenStudy (therealmeeeee):

I think!

OpenStudy (anonymous):

It is effective. It supports the claim clearly and logically. both of the statements state tat unless they mke the laws stronger the drugs will get into the prison rather than keeping them out .

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!