This is one proposal that will definitely anger some people: Everyone should have a pet. There should be a law that makes sure everyone will get a pet or give a legitimate reason why they cannot. There are almost infinite arguments to favor owning animals, so not all of them can be listed. The small number of comments against owning pets don't even need to be included. I'll post the question.
Which of the following questions would help a reader better approach the point in the first paragraph? A. Why does the author's claim anger people? B. How is bias visible in the first paragraph? C. Which pet is best? D. Which people should not own pets?
d
I don't think it is D because the writer already said that everyone should own a pet.
well i just thought that because most people are allergic but my second would be c sorry if this doesnt help you
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!