Which of the following best explains why clear-cutting forests is more destructive than selectively cutting down trees in forests?

a.

Clear-cutting eliminates all trees leaving none behind to maintain soil fertility or house native animals.

b.

Clear-cutting places the land at greater risk for wildfires.

c.

Clear-cutting makes land more attractive for human development.

d.

Clear-cutting causes less soil erosion than selective cutting.

Question

Which of the following best explains why clear-cutting forests is more destructive than selectively cutting down trees in forests?


a.
 
Clear-cutting eliminates all trees leaving none behind to maintain soil fertility or house native animals.
 

b.
 
Clear-cutting places the land at greater risk for wildfires.
 

c.
 
Clear-cutting makes land more attractive for human development.
 

d.
 
Clear-cutting causes less soil erosion than selective cutting.

shreehari499 · Answer

Clear-cutting eliminates all trees leaving none behind to maintain soil fertility or house native animals....:)

shreehari499 · Answer

Comparatively a good answer..:)

hugsnotughs · Answer

@shreehari499 beat me, but I agree with him/her. :D

shreehari499 · Answer

Its Him..and thank you!

hugsnotughs · Answer

Sorry. >_<  Ur welcome. ;-)