Question

What was the difference between Darwin and Lamarck?


A.
They both tried to explain evolution, but Lamarck was able to support it with evidence.


B.


They both tried to explain evolution, but Darwin was able to support it with evidence.


C.


They both understood how mutations occurred, but Darwin was able to support it with evidence.


D.
They both understood how mutations occurred, but Lamarck was able to support it with evidence.

Answer 1

B

Answer 2

r u 100% sure

Answer 3

let me c

Answer 4

lol
http://dujs.dartmouth.edu/wp-content/uploads/dujs-comic-1-.jpg

Answer 5

Darwin's theory has been supported by a lot of evidence. Lamarck's Theory of Inheritance of Acquired Characteristics has been disproved. This was done in two major ways. The first is by experiment. We have seen through many real examples and observations that changes that occur in an animal during life are not passed on to the animal's offspring. If a dog's ears are cropped short, its puppies are still born with long ears. If someone exercises every day, runs marathons, eats well, and is generally very healthy, the fitness is not passed on and the person's children still have to work just as hard to get that fit and healthy. These and other examples show that Lamarck's theory does not explain how life formed and became the way it is.

Answer 6

so its b?

Answer 7

yus

Answer 8

ill give u the medal if its right ill let u know soon

Answer 9

Hai Sweet Friend, @1234567891011121314151617181920 WelcoMe To OpeN studY !!

Hope, if U Are Satisfied with @aajugdar Answer, Please Close This Question !

Thank U !! Keep In Touch, with Open study !!