Question

Which sentence best explains why shape 1 and shape 2 are not congruent?

Answer 1

help please :)

Answer 2

Shape 1 cannot be mapped onto shape 2 using a reflection.



Shape 1 cannot be mapped onto shape 2 using a dilation.



There is no sequence of rigid transformations that will map shape 1 onto shape 2.



Not all corresponding pairs of sides on the two shapes are parallel.



Not all corresponding pairs of sides on the two shapes are perpendicular.

Answer 3

those are the options

Answer 4

Parallelity matters.

Answer 5

so it would be D?

Answer 6

No no! I am probably wrong.

Answer 7

oooooo

Answer 8

n geometry, two figures or objects are congruent if they have the same shape and size, or if one has the same shape and size as the mirror image of the other.More formally, two sets of points are called congruent if, and only if, one can be transformed into the other by an isometry, i.e., a combination of rigid motions, namely translations, rotations and reflections. This means that either object can be repositioned and reflected (but not resized) so as to coincide precisely with the other object.

Answer 9

There is no sequence of rigid transformations would be the true answer.

Answer 10

ouu thank you so much !!!! i would fan you but im already your fan :) thank you so much i really dont know anything about this lol :)

Answer 11

I am happy to help you :) You don't have to be my fan.