As a result of Miranda v. Arizona (1966), nothing suspects say can be used against them in court unless __________.
A.
two witnesses are present when they make their statement
B.
they have been advised of their rights
C.
the defense attorney gives permission for it to be used
D.
the suspect becomes violent with arresting officers

Question

As a result of Miranda v. Arizona (1966), nothing suspects say can be used against them in court unless __________.
A.
two witnesses are present when they make their statement
B.
they have been advised of their rights
C.
the defense attorney gives permission for it to be used
D.
the suspect becomes violent with arresting officers

nurali · Answer

i think they have been advised of their rights.

anonymous · Answer

thank you so much! i have one more question. could you help ?

nurali · Answer

My Pleasure.

nurali · Answer

I will try.

anonymous · Answer

true or false Except for cases involving the President of the United States, the Supreme Court has the final say in all of the cases it hears.

nurali · Answer

i think False.