PLEASE HELP ME!!!!!!
Which of the following describes a disadvantage secondary sources have compared to primary sources?

A. They are created by people who have never experienced the historical period they describe.
B. They are extremely rare and much harder for historians to locate.
C. They do not rely on historical evidence to support their conclusions.
D. They focus too closely on a single piece of evidence instead of providing summaries.

Question

PLEASE HELP ME!!!!!!
Which of the following describes a disadvantage secondary sources have compared to primary sources?

 		A.	They are created by people who have never experienced the historical period they describe.
 		B.	They are extremely rare and much harder for historians to locate.
 		C.	They do not rely on historical evidence to support their conclusions.
 		D.	They focus too closely on a single piece of evidence instead of providing summaries.

wolfboy · Answer

I would go with a due to the fact that secondary sources come form people writing about what they read in primary sources

anonymous · Answer

thank you!!!!!!! (: i really appreciate it your the best