Question

medal n followe

Answer 1

Question 1 (Multiple Choice Worth 1 points)

(Active Citizens LO 2 MC)

The landmark decision established during Marbury v. Madison ultimately resulted in defining which of the following in the American government?

The system used to establish the chief justices

The division of power among branches

The ratification procedure for the Constitution

The process of checks and balances

Question 2 (Multiple Choice Worth 1 points)

(Active Citizens LO 2 MC)

Which of these book titles best describes the Brown v. Board of Education ruling and why?

A Struggle for Freedom - Brown v. Board of Education attempted to end legal segregation in public schools, but failed.

A Fundamental Change - Brown v. Board of Education found in favor of Moses Brown, a black man who petitioned to teach in the public school system.

The Five Cases of Hope - Brown v. Board of Education was actually a collection of cases from five states challenging laws of segregation in public schools.

The Road to Justice - Brown v. Board of Education ended legal segregation in public schools.

Question 3 (Multiple Choice Worth 1 points)

(Active Citizens LO 4 MC)

Which question below did the Miranda v. Arizona outcome answer?

Should more evidence be required to arrest someone of a crime than just the victim's identification of the accused criminal?

Should a defendant be allowed to sign a written confession to a crime if an attorney is not present when the accused is being questioned by the police?

Should legal counsel always be appointed by the court, or should the citizen accused of a crime have the right to choose the attorney he would like to represent him?

Should a confession be allowed in a court of law if it was obtained without warnings against self-incrimination and without legal counsel?

Question 4 (Multiple Choice Worth 1 points)

(Active Citizens LO 4 MC)

Which of the following best describes the Miranda v. Arizona case and its significance?

Miranda v. Arizona was about being wrongly identified by an accuser. The case helped create a rule that more than an accuser's identification was needed for an arrest.

Miranda v. Arizona was about confessing without an attorney present. The case helped create a rule that an attorney must be present for suspects being questioned by police.

Miranda v. Arizona was about protecting a person's 5th and 6th Amendment rights. The ruling gave police the burden of reminding citizens of their rights when arrested.

Miranda v. Arizona was about a signed confession obtained by conspiracy between police and Miranda's attorney. The judge ruled that attorneys must be self or court appointed.

Answer 2

@AnswerMyQuestions

Answer 3

Oh, I just finished that module in Civics.

Answer 4

I think first one is B

Answer 5

Next is D.

Answer 6

I think 3rd one is D too.

Answer 7

Next is C.