Three of the following were strengths which enabled the Byzantine Empire to last for over 1,000 years. Which was NOT a well-trained and loyal army defended the empire an efficient and professional civil service administered the empire the provision for an orderly succession to the throne prevented civil wars a prosperous economy based on commerce and agriculture provided finances for the imperial government
help
I'd probably go with that there was no provision for an orderly succession to the throne. Byzantine history is rife with a number of instances where individuals either waged war, assassinated successors, manipulated the administration, or rode a wave of sheer popularity against a current emperor to take the throne. For example, Justinian I was actually challenged by a giant mob of tens of thousands of people in his own city who proclaimed Hypatius (a former commander) as their emperor in response to the brutal taxes levied against them. Justinian responded by rallying loyal commanders around him after his wife, Theodora, urged him to face them down. The Imperial Guard trapping the demonstrators at the Hippodrome and slaughtering nearly all of them. Hypatius was captured and executed. Other items contributed to the empire's long-term health before its decline. The Byzantines had a large and professional army (when they actually could support one and via the theme system), a huge bureaucratic administration kept institutional order within the empire executing its laws and providing a semblance of continuity, and the economy was prosperous for the most part with trade between Europe and Asia before the rise of the Italian city-states and the Ottomans.
Gunner bruce phone number 812 259 2904
)the provision for an orderly succession to the throne prevented civil wars
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!