Which accurately describes a chart developed 20 years after a historical event?
a.effective secondary source document
b.too biased for historical evidence
c.too focused for historical evidence
d.unreliable narrative source
e.useful primary source document
Still Need Help?
Join the QuestionCove community and study together with friends!
Sign Up
OpenStudy (just_one_last_goodbye):
still need help? ^_^
OpenStudy (anonymous):
yess
OpenStudy (just_one_last_goodbye):
lets take a look then c: hey my names Kevin btw nice to meet you
OpenStudy (anonymous):
nice to meet you to mines sienna.
OpenStudy (just_one_last_goodbye):
nice name ^_^
Still Need Help?
Join the QuestionCove community and study together with friends!
Sign Up
OpenStudy (anonymous):
thanks,
OpenStudy (just_one_last_goodbye):
lets start by eliminating answer choices agreed?
OpenStudy (anonymous):
okaay soooo?
OpenStudy (just_one_last_goodbye):
Well C we can get rid of cause it says unreliable lets say for example you 20 years into the future from now and people want to say you had sexual contact with someone or killed someone today but dont have proof. Then that is not right cause its personal opinion
OpenStudy (anonymous):
okaaay tht makees senseee ,
Still Need Help?
Join the QuestionCove community and study together with friends!
Sign Up
OpenStudy (anonymous):
???
OpenStudy (just_one_last_goodbye):
oh lol sorry i mean D so D is out not C
OpenStudy (anonymous):
okaaay sooo doo you have an idea of wat it could bee?
OpenStudy (just_one_last_goodbye):
think C or E
OpenStudy (anonymous):
mee too.
Still Need Help?
Join the QuestionCove community and study together with friends!