What did Charles Darwin mean when he stated that some organisms were 'more fit' than other organisms? A) some organisms were heavier and stronger B) some organisms were more likely to reproduce C) not all organisms had the same natural life span Eliminate D) not all organisms were equally suited to gathering food
@Destinymasha
"all organisms are equal, but some organisms are more equal than others"
so is it D
d is partly correct but only as a by product of B) some organisms were more likely to reproduce
c
C
yes
B is the correct answer because only organisms most fit for survival will reproduce and survive and thrive and out live others
no its c
no lol
thx
THANK YOU
it was the Darwinian postulation that regardless of how long a organism lives its entirely dependant on its ability to survive an ecosystem and the competion thereof
it doesnt matter if i have a life spand of 100000 years if i cant walk or move my hands
if a bird has the life expectancy of 999999 years it will still die out before a bird with a 20 year life span if it cannot adapt to its environ faster
life expectancy is fickle and is not accurate and relies on aspersions
what matters is the organisms ability to use its unique traits to survive a environment
well i gotta 70 thats good but i gtg good night thx 4 da help
i dont care if i am the biggest most muscly dude in the world; if i am put in an environment were speed is required i will die and vice versa
if i am the smartest person in the world but get placed in a situation where i need strength and stamina i will die
@naomi12345
if i am the sexiest guy in the whole world then i will still be poor if i dont have the basic skills to get a job
the possibilities are endless but the conclusion remains the same: ONLY ORGANISMS WITH THE ABILITY TO SURVIVE IN UNIQUE AND INIMITABLE ENVIRONMENTS WILL SURVIVE REGARDLESS OF THE life span of others
B is the answer. To be more "fit" in these terms means to have traits that will aid you in being better able to survive and reproduce.
@arabpride @mkerr017 @superhelp101
bahahaha you prolly killed wutever braincells were left in da guy x'DDD jkz i Agree~ He iz sexeh o-o'
It's the basis of social Darwinism. See. I'm smart too.
No durrrrrrrrrrrrr!!!!! lolz WHo DIDN'T know that? x'D jkjkz good job - Darwin's Loaded with umm the initials of -Bologna Sandwhiches- smhsmh cx
so true
*frowny face, sobs* *quiet voice* "i is smart"
ofc you are siz
i know that because i'm smart
gosh prae, you terrible person
????
WUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUT~~
You're just jealous - but i agree he's terrible
terrible sexeh! x'D
I got seventh place at a smart person tournamet one time out of like 60 other smart people
COWER AT MY GLORY MORTALS
i just said you were smart.......i wasnt being sarcastic......
mean i fort the -ly* x-x
...guys im kidding :P
but i am not
i do think youre smart sis
FORGOT* x-x lolz im joking too cx
i know. I really did get seventh place at a smart person tournament though, a fact i am VERY proud of. However, i slightly disagree with some of your reasoning when answering this question, it is completely circumstantial
for example, if you were, going back to prae's example, the most muscley dude ever" even if you weren't as smart as others, because of society's infatuation with good looks, you would still probably be able to hold a job and possibly make more money than someone who was both smart and personable and driven because the world is weird like that.
yes? do i have completely faulty logic or not?
Yea' Yea' ~
:D
|dw:1412901902451:dw|
|dw:1412902076770:dw|
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!