Question

Can someone please help?

Answer 1

@Preetha @kirbykirby @bibby

Answer 2

Need help? @happyfeet8040

Answer 3

Yes! Can you help, please?

Answer 4

Sure

Answer 5

Okay, thank you soo much. I only have 2-3 questions. :)

Answer 6

Which was not a goal of the Nazi Party?

uniting the German people into one nation

creating a strong political and military alliance with France

depriving Jews and non-Germans of German citizenship

re-building the German economy

Answer 7

If you don't know any of these, you don't have to help.. But it would make a difference if you could at least try.. :) I'll give you a medal & I'll fan.

Answer 8

I'll give it a try. I'm here to offer help. I believe that the first option should be correct, in addition to the third, so the only two with major discrepancies are the second and the fourth. So remember if you will, the events that transpired in WWII. What was Germany's relationship with France?

Answer 9

Sorry that took so long. I forgot my history classes for a moment. :3

Answer 10

It's okay, and France wanted revenge for their loss in the Franco-Prussian wars

Answer 11

I think..

Answer 12

So B?

Answer 13

Yes, b, but not for the reason you gave. I believe that The french-german tension was a factor for WWI, not WWII. The reason it's B is that Germany's main goal was that of "breathing space" for their people. causing them to invade neighboring countries, one of which was France, meaning that no alliance was attempted. Even if that's not the right explanation, since A and C have been established D can be ruled out because the nazi party was originally a political party based in economics the "national socialist german workers party." Make sense?

Answer 14

Yes, that makes a lot of sense, thanks

Answer 15

Do you mind helping me with two more?

Answer 16

Sure.

Answer 17

What justification did the Soviet leadership use to rationalize the Holomodor?

The Russian serfs' purposely reduced the amount of goods they were producing in protest, which reduced much needed revenue from exporting grain.

The Ukrainian protests would disrupt Stalin's plans for collectivizing agricultural farmland across the Soviet Union and were disrupting Stalin's plans for collectivizing agriculture.

The process of collectivizing agricultural production allowed Ukranian farmers to specialize in particular products, leading them to demand too high of a price for them from the Soviet government.

The peasant revolt following collectivization of agricultural lands was an anti-communist uprising supported by Western democracies that feared collectivization would push the Soviets ahead of them.

Answer 18

I got really stuck on this one

Answer 19

If you could explain this one also, that would help :)

Answer 20

Well to start, we could examine what holomodor was. So what do you remember about it?

Answer 21

The Holodomor was a famine in the Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic and it killed a lot of people.

Answer 22

I know the answer, but the answer is sort of it's own explanation. So one of Stalin's main goals was to collectivize agriculture, and the official stance of many countries is that the holomodor was an act of genocide, thus the "justify" in the question. The official stance is that the holomodor was to stop protests. So the answer is B.

Answer 23

Okay, I understand.

Answer 24

One more :)

Answer 25

Ok.

Answer 26

President Truman decided to use atomic bombs against Japan in 1945. Which conclusion about why he decided to use atomic bombs is best supported by this propaganda poster?

Truman feared a ground invasion would lead to the capture, torture, or death of American troops.

Truman wanted to avoid taking revenge for the Japanese torture of American POWs in the Philippines.

Truman believed that American forces were incapable of defeating the Japanese forces.

Truman thought the Japanese military had their own atomic weapon.





http://gyazo.com/33f8620456e32c9eaf5e177acc2bdbd9

Answer 27

Truman's official statement concerned the saving of lives. Additionally, the poster demonstrates the large loss of life of the american troops. So in relation, ending the war would save the lives of troops. So the answer is A, Understand?

Answer 28

Ohh okay, I understand now. Thank you so much for all your help and taking time out to explain these! :))

Answer 29

I'm obviously not so good In History haha

Answer 30

no problem