Question

The Supreme Court interpreted the Fifth Amendment in

A. Gideon v. Wainwright to mean that accused people have a right to be informed of their rights
b. Gideon v. Wainwright to mean states must pay for counsel if the defendant cannot afford it
c. Miranda v. Arizona to mean states must pay for counsel if the defendant cannot afford it
d. Miranda v. Arizona to mean that accused people have a right to be informed of their rights