Question

Schmerber v. California, the Court said that a search warrant was not necessary because _____.
A. the suspect’s privacy rights cannot be violated
B. the suspect’s blood was drawn in a safe way
C. the officer did not have time to secure a warrant
D. the rights of the individual take precedence over public safety

Answer 1

@AndrewKaiser333

Answer 2

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0CCAQFjAA&url=https%3A%2F%2Fsupreme.justia.com%2Fcases%2Ffederal%2Fus%2F384%2F757%2Fcase.html&ei=A_giVPvFJsiCjAKpm4HwCw&usg=AFQjCNHPBxgF6aAHHGVN-9TzWKvDwAjRAw&sig2=tyQI5C1nctCTbzAHfcsHBQ&bvm=bv.75775273,d.cGE
this will help

Answer 3

hello?

Answer 4

B Correct?

Answer 5

sorry to say but your wrong

Answer 6

It says if you read it that c is the answer because what is said on c is what is in the document i sent you

Answer 7

i mean D

Answer 8

not C

Answer 9

typo

Answer 10

Thank you @AndrewKaiser333