Question

@geekfromthefutur @leonardo0430

Scientific consensus supports the idea that living organisms require oxygen. Then, a scientist discovers a type of bacteria that metabolizes sulfur instead of oxygen, and thus survives in environments without oxygen. The scientist concludes that a diverse group of many different organisms could live in an oxygen-free environment. Why should are some scientists skeptical of the scientist’s results and conclusion?

A. The results are different from the scientific consensus.

B. The conclusion shows the scientist is not open-minded.

C. The results will be difficult for scientists to reproduce.

D. The conclusion needs to be supported by more evidence.

Answer 1

gtg taking math test ;-; A.

Answer 2

Alright Thanks for all your help

Answer 3

yeh anytime