Help please.
With what?
a 25 question test I am horrible at history
omg. same here
ask away^-^
The three-fifths compromise was an agreement at the Constitutional Convention, which stated that in calculating population for state representation __________. A. a slave counted as three-fifths of a human being B. women only counted as three-fifths of a person C. only three-fifths of a state’s population was allowed to be slaves D. only landowning citizens counted as a full person; all others counted as three-fifths of a person
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three-Fifths_Compromise << if you read that your answer would be D In order to satisfy the southern slave holding states on the issue of determining population for representation in the National Government. The northern non-slave holding state didn't want slaves to count as a whole person, or the population in the south would be too much. The southern states wanted the slaves to be counted. The compromise was the 5 slaves would count as 3 people. Answer The 3/5 Compromise was a political negotiation by the South to achieve more voting power in the national legislature. They used the (possibly real) threat of alliance with the British (the South liked the economic business they had with the British), as well as the threat that a country fractured between North and South would eventually succumb to one or more of the old empires (Britain, France and Spain) to achieve the 3/5 Compromise. These threats were used as leverage to achieve voting power in the legislature for slaves , of course these new votes would be cast in their masters' interest. The power of this "negro vote" is what put Thomas Jefferson in the White House and allowed the South to not merely continue, but expand slavery. He won in 1800 by only the margin created by the "negro vote". Garry Wills' book "Negro President: Thomas Jefferson and the Slave Power" (ISBN: 0618485376) gives great in-depth service to this topic. It's a great read! Answer As a point of clarification, the 3/5 compromise was never "added" to the U.S. Constitution. It was a Supreme Court interpretation of the Constitution that came out of the "Dredd Scott" case. If you're going to provide an answer, or a "clarification", you have some responsibility to do at least a minimum amount of research, and not to make flatly false statements. Article I. Section. 2. Clause 3: Representatives and direct Taxes shall be apportioned among the several States which may be included within this Union, according to their respective Numbers, which shall be determined by adding to the whole Number of free Persons, including those bound to Service for a Term of Years, and excluding Indians not taxed, three fifths of all other Persons. [...] Answer The 3/5 compromise was added so the Northern and Southern states could come to an agreement of how slaves were counted in the population. If all the slaves were counted, Southern states would gain more legislative power by means of more representatives. So, the 3/5 compromise was created so the slaves didn't count as a whole, and so the Northern states thought legislative power distribution was equal. Answer The 3/5 compromise was to distribute equal representation among the northern and southern states whereas the Dredd Scott case was concerning slave rights and freedom (He was moved to a free state and when he moved back sued because he was declared free) Answer A short, direct question deserves the same in a response. The 3/5 Compromise was added to the Constitution simply to settle an issue of "representation."
So D lol
holy ._.
Because of the weak laws set forth in the Constitution, the Articles of Confederation were drafted to take power away from the states. true or false?
false, The Articles of Confederation existed before the Constitution we know today, and were more focused on state's rights. Look up Shay's Rebellion for explanation i dont wanna make you read lmao
Approval by the states of __________ and __________ was considered critical to support for the Constitution. A. Virginia . . . New York B. Maryland . . . New Hampshire C. Delaware . . . Pennsylvania D. George . . . Connecticut
Although Virginia and New York were the 10th and 11th States to ratify the Constitution, it only took 9 to ratify the document,these states had the most people and most wealth of all the states, with the possible exception of Pennsylvania. it is hard to see how the Constitution could have been ratified without these 2 states. so a is correct
Virgina and new york
During the Constitutional Convention, __________ proposed the addition of a Bill of Rights to the Constitution itself, but his proposal was voted down because __________. A. George Mason . . . the delegates thought it was unnecessary B. Thomas Jefferson . . . the delegates thought it would be redundant C. James Madison . . . the delegates thought state constitutions already protected rights D. Benjamin Franklin . . . the delegates believed the Constitution included individual rights
A. [ George Mason proposed the addition of a Bill of Rights to the Constitution itself, but his proposal was voted down because the delegates thought it was unnecessary
All of the following describe the ratification of the Constitution in New York EXCEPT: A. Alexander Hamilton argued strongly for ratification. B. The Constitution was accepted by a vote of 30 to 27. C. The governor of New York was a well-respected Federalist. D. Around two-thirds of the delegates of the ratifying convention were Anti-Federalists.
@Brandonsnider188
D, Around two-thirds of the delegates of the ratifying convention were Anti-Federalists
Thanks! ^_^ I got like 10 more... If you want to help.
i have to go right now to counseling if you have a kik message me bramond18 or insta direct brandonsnider18
Alright
I'll kik you
Please post questions individually, and not a bunch in the same one. Thanks
i didnt get your kik
Yeah I know. I forgot D:
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!