debate question: do you think that money defines love?
@melodicmusican5 it wont let me message you? but so far i have Many people think that certain things can prove that you love someone such as money, or a ring but then they also believe that money doesn't bring happiness
It look good so far @mcnabkt
i think i should change somthing but idk like instead of well idk it kind of makes sense lol
im stuck lol help
i need atleast another sentence to help me continue
like i dont want to focus on about the fact of a ring not proving love for another
@mcnabkt " Not everyone has the same viewpoints as others when it comes to love, but for me love in my eyes is looked at by a totally different perspective,"
hmm thats really good :)
so far i have Many people think that certain things can prove that you love someone such as money, or a ring but then they also believe that money doesn't bring happiness. But I am highly against this because " Not everyone has the same viewpoints as others when it comes to love, but for me love in my eyes is looked at by a totally different perspective,"
@mcnabkt I like it , its really good so far! :)
alright lets see if i can get into more detail lol
To me, love can be shown by actions or feelings not whether if or how much they pay for something. I believe this because I don't think that should be a way of defining something because that's what makes us
i need a good word lol
that explains them as ignorant or selfish like makes us seem like all we care about is money
but we dont maybe decevious?
@Data_LG2 base your opinion lol
well both of you but yeah
whats a good word?
@mcnabkt "uniquely individual"
wait just that or an uniquely individual? i mean cause people do seem to turn heads when we base opinions lol
hmm.. maybe change the wording a little bit..because honestly, the part when it says "But I am highly against this because, 'Not everyone has the same viewpoints as others when it comes to love, but for me \(\color{red} {\sf love\ in\ my\ eyes}\) is looked at by a totally different perspective' ..what do you mean by love in my eyes O.o also, which side are you trying to defend? are you doing an introduction for your debate or you are already stating your arguments?
well im trying to say that you dont need an amount of money to prove that you love/like someone like a ring doesnt prove that so yeah
and i mean like i dont think that the guy should have to pay for it just to define that he really means it
dang @Data_LG2 lol
"In my opinion, love can be shown through actions or feelings, not through the worth of material things that are used to make our love ones happy. I strongly believe that the happiness of giving gifts is not even equal to the happiness love can give us when we express it to show through actions." the last part is good enough :) gimme a moment to analyze the first one..
so instead of putting to me love.... just put that? or add on?
no the part that i edited is this : To me, love can be shown by actions or feelings not whether if or how much they pay for something. I believe this because I don't think that should be a way of defining something because that's what makes us
so i put that?
or should i?
entirely up to you, i'm just helping xDD
wait makes us what lol a uniquely individual?
so far
Many people think that certain things can prove that you love someone such as money, or a ring but then they also believe that money doesn't bring happiness. But I am highly against this because " Not everyone has the same viewpoints as others when it comes to love but for me love in my eyes is looked at by a totally different perspective' "In my opinion, love can be shown through actions or feelings, not through the worth of material things that are used to make our love ones happy. I strongly believe that the happiness of giving gifts is not even equal to the happiness love can give us when we express it to show through actions."
does that make sense?
well obvi. it does you kinda gave me the plus lol
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!