I will give FAN and MEDAL!!
In at least two well-written paragraphs, explain the significance of one of the cases below and describe how the case relates to federalism.
McCulloch v. Maryland, Gibbons v. Ogden, or District of Columbia v. Heller

Question

I will give FAN and MEDAL!!
In at least two well-written paragraphs, explain the significance of one of the cases below and describe how the case relates to federalism. 
McCulloch v. Maryland, Gibbons v. Ogden, or District of Columbia v. Heller

anonymous · Answer

@Joel_the_boss @neko_of_hearts @Firejay5 @bibby @damara1213 @micahm

joel_the_boss · Answer

Yea you see that's the problem... This is a study website were not here to do the work for you. But if you need some help let me now.

anonymous · Answer

please help then

joel_the_boss · Answer

I've never learned about any of that.

joel_the_boss · Answer

And any ways @micahm  will give you some useful info, im sure of it.

anonymous · Answer

I know he always helps me but I need help fast I am in a hurry I have 9 other classes to do today

joel_the_boss · Answer

Gibbons v. Ogden (1824)

Gibbons v. Ogden (1824)
Chief Justice John Marshall
U.S. Supreme Court
1824
Gibbons v. Ogden is considered a landmark supreme court case on the issue of the Interstate Commerce Clause. Aaron Ogden was given an exclusive license to operate a shipping business within the State of New York. He sued a man named Thomas Gibbons, who ran a competing shipping business between New Jersey and New York City, claiming that Gibbon's operations in the State of New York were illegal. Gibbons was given permission to operate his business by Congress.

The case went all the way to the Supreme Court, which ruled in favor of Thomas Gibbons. John Marshall wrote the opinion of the court, saying that the commerce clause includes not only "commerce," or the trade of commodities, but also that it gives Congress the right to regulate navigation as well. 

I found this but I don't recommend copying word for word. paraphrase it.

anonymous · Answer

ok but I have looked at this already... the problem is that I don't understand it and how it answers the prompt

micahm · Answer

if you look up the McCulloch v. Maryland, Gibbons v. Ogden, or District of Columbia v. Heller  that how you get your answer

joel_the_boss · Answer

@kyley_bear  The purpose of the prompt is to explain hoe each of these is import, although you can only choose one. It's asking what happened, what made this significant, etc.