A marine biologist has been studying sharks for two years. She has been using raw chicken to study their feeding behavior. Sharks seemed to like raw chicken as well as they did raw fish. One day, she threw a bucket of raw chicken in front of a swimming shark. The shark swam past the chicken and moved away from the boat. The marine biologist concluded that the shark did not feed because it was not hungry. Another marine biologist evaluated the first biologist's explanation and determined that ---- A. The scientific explanation was not sound because the marine biologist's observations
A. The scientific explanation was not sound because the marine biologist's observations lack data relating to the shark's level of hunger. B. The scientific explanation was not sound because chickens are land animals and not marine creatures. C. The scientific explanation was sound because the marine biologist's recorded observations show that the shark ignored the raw chicken. D. The scientific explanation was sound because most organisms do not feed when they are not hungry.
pls help
I think it is A
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!