Which answer best explains the Cherokee's main argument against Georgia in Cherokee Nation v. Georgia?
The Cherokee argued they had legally bought their land from other tribes. The Cherokee argued they were a separate nation and not bound by state laws. The Cherokee argued they had already signed an agreement with the federal government. The Cherokee argued they had given all their land to the missions so Georgia had no case.

Question

Which answer best explains the Cherokee's main argument against Georgia in Cherokee Nation v. Georgia?
The Cherokee argued they had legally bought their land from other tribes. The Cherokee argued they were a separate nation and not bound by state laws. The Cherokee argued they had already signed an agreement with the federal government. The Cherokee argued they had given all their land to the missions so Georgia had no case.

anonymous · Answer

B