Ask your own question, for FREE!
History 21 Online
OpenStudy (anonymous):

Please help me will give you medal and be your fan!!

OpenStudy (goalieboy):

what you need help with

OpenStudy (anonymous):

What resulted from the Supreme Court's ruling in Miranda v. Arizona (1966)? A. Evidence obtained in an unconstitutional manner could not be used in court. B. Prosecutors could no longer engage in plea bargaining with defense attorneys. C. People who were being arrested had to be informed of their Constitutional rights. D. Criminal defendants who could not afford an attorney had to be provided with one for free. I thinks its C but i am not sure

OpenStudy (anonymous):

That is the one that makes the most sense to me

OpenStudy (goalieboy):

it is C indeed

OpenStudy (anonymous):

thanks can you help me with a couple more

OpenStudy (anonymous):

What did the court cases of Griswold v. Connecticut and Roe v. Wade have in common? A. Civil Rights cases B. states' rights cases C. discrimination cases D. reproductive rights cases

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!